Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: North Carolina
Albert F. Foster
Private Albert F. Foster of Congo, North Carolina is listed in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: North Carolina (1920) as soldier, world war i (killed in action). The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.
Soldier, World War I (killed in action), 1920
505 people in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: North Carolina · 108 more named Foster
- Full name
- Albert F. Foster
- Source
- Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: North Carolina
- Listed as
- Soldier, World War I (killed in action), 1920
Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else
Is Albert part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.
Also in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: North Carolina
Frank C. FloydSoldiers of the Great War, 1920: North Carolina 1920
Walter E. FosterSoldiers of the Great War, 1920: North Carolina 1920
James W. FisherSoldiers of the Great War, 1920: North Carolina 1920
James C. FrazierSoldiers of the Great War, 1920: North Carolina 1920
Fred L. FinisonSoldiers of the Great War, 1920: North Carolina 1920
Caro E. FreemanSoldiers of the Great War, 1920: North Carolina 1920
Others named Foster
Same surname in the archive.
All 108 people named Foster →Look for Albert F. Foster in other records
- FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
- Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
- Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress
Do you know Albert?
If Albert is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.
Source
Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: North Carolina, page 388.
View the original
at the Internet Archive (item SoldiersOfTheGreatWarV2).
Published 1920, and therefore in the public domain in the United States. Scan courtesy of Internet Archive via the Internet Archive.
How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards