Bain News Service photographs · United States
Arthur J. Tuttle
Arthur J. Tuttle is listed in Bain News Service photographs (about 1900-1920) as portrait. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.
Portrait, about 1900-1920
1635 people in Bain News Service photographs · 22 more named Tuttle
- Full name
- Arthur J. Tuttle
- Source
- Bain News Service photographs
- Listed as
- Portrait, about 1900-1920
Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else
Is Arthur part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.
In context
Arthur J. Tuttle is number 1460 of 1635 in the alphabetical list of the collection “Bain News Service photographs” on this site. Counting Arthur, 969 entries from this book are dated 1910.
| Same year | 1910: 968 other entries in this book |
|---|
Also in Bain News Service photographs
Charles TupperBain News Service photographs 1910
Lucius TuttleBain News Service photographs 1910
James M. TunnellBain News Service photographs 1910
Joseph T. TykocinerBain News Service photographs 1920
George Loane TuckerBain News Service photographs 1915
Amelia TylerBain News Service photographs 1910
Others named Tuttle
Same surname in the archive.
All 22 people named Tuttle →Look for Arthur J. Tuttle in other records
- FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
- Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
- Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress
Do you know Arthur?
If Arthur is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.
Source
Bain News Service photographs, about 1900-1920.
View the original
(item loc:2014717700).
No known restrictions on publication. Bain News Service press photograph (1900s-1920s). Held by the Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division.
How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards