Bain News Service photographs · United States
Carl W. Riddick
Carl W. Riddick is listed in Bain News Service photographs (1920) as portrait. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.
Portrait, 1920
1635 people in Bain News Service photographs · 4 more named Riddick
- Full name
- Carl W. Riddick
- Source
- Bain News Service photographs
- Listed as
- Portrait, 1920
Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else
Is Carl part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.
In context
In the alphabetical roll of 1635 names from the collection “Bain News Service photographs”, Carl stands 1217th. Carl's entry is dated 1920, a year shared by 154 other people in this book on this site.
| Same year | 1920: 154 other entries in this book |
|---|
Also in Bain News Service photographs
George A. RickerBain News Service photographs 1910
George W. RiddleBain News Service photographs 1910
Nettie M. RichardsonBain News Service photographs 1915
Thomas RiggsBain News Service photographs 1915
John G. RichardsBain News Service photographs 1910
Edward RightorBain News Service photographs 1915
Other people named Carl W. Riddick in the archive
Names are not unique. Check the school and year before assuming this is the person you are looking for.
Look for Carl W. Riddick in other records
- FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
- Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
- Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress
Do you know Carl?
If Carl is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.
Source
Bain News Service photographs, 1920.
View the original
(item loc:2014715117).
No known restrictions on publication. Bain News Service press photograph (1900s-1920s). Held by the Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division.
How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards
