Bain News Service photographs · United States
Edward Hines
Edward Hines is listed in Bain News Service photographs (about 1900-1920) as portrait. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.
Portrait, about 1900-1920
1635 people in Bain News Service photographs · 25 more named Hines
- Full name
- Edward Hines
- Source
- Bain News Service photographs
- Listed as
- Portrait, about 1900-1920
Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else
Is Edward part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.
In context
Of the 1635 entries from the collection “Bain News Service photographs” that have pages here, Edward is 704th in surname order. Counting Edward, 969 entries from this book are dated 1910.
| Same year | 1910: 968 other entries in this book |
|---|
Also in Bain News Service photographs
Gladys HinckleyBain News Service photographs 1910
James F. HinkleBain News Service photographs 1910
Joseph HillstromBain News Service photographs 1915
Fred. C. HironsBain News Service photographs 1910
Samuel HillBain News Service photographs 1915
Roger Sherman HoarBain News Service photographs 1910
Others named Hines
Same surname in the archive.
All 25 people named Hines →Look for Edward Hines in other records
- FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
- Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
- Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress
Do you know Edward?
If Edward is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.
Source
Bain News Service photographs, about 1900-1920.
View the original
(item loc:2014685908).
No known restrictions on publication. Bain News Service press photograph (1900s-1920s). Held by the Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division.
How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards
