Bain News Service photographs · United States
Frank O. Cole
Frank O. Cole is listed in Bain News Service photographs (1910) as portrait. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.
Portrait, 1910
1635 people in Bain News Service photographs · 92 more named Cole
- Full name
- Frank O. Cole
- Source
- Bain News Service photographs
- Listed as
- Portrait, 1910
Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else
Is Frank part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.
In context
This site lists 1635 people from the collection “Bain News Service photographs”; sorted by surname, Frank comes 286th. 968 other entries in this book on this site carry the year 1910, as Frank's does.
| Same year | 1910: 968 other entries in this book |
|---|
Also in Bain News Service photographs
Elizabeth ColbertBain News Service photographs 1915
Olive A. ColeBain News Service photographs 1915
Howard E. CoffinBain News Service photographs 1915
Fred W. B. ColemanBain News Service photographs 1920
Dorothy CochranBain News Service photographs 1915
William M. CollinsBain News Service photographs 1910
Others named Cole
Same surname in the archive.
Olive A. ColeBain News Service photographs 1915
Cornelius ColeNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1922
Look for Frank O. Cole in other records
- FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
- Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
- Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress
Do you know Frank?
If Frank is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.
Source
Bain News Service photographs, 1910.
View the original
(item loc:2014697055).
No known restrictions on publication. Bain News Service press photograph (1900s-1920s). Held by the Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division.
How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards