Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Illinois

Geo Usherwood

Geo Usherwood of Lincoln, Illinois is listed in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Illinois (1920) as soldier, world war i (died of disease). The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.

Soldier, World War I (died of disease), 1920

752 people in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Illinois · 1 more named Usherwood

Full name: Geo Usherwood
Source: Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Illinois
Listed as: Soldier, World War I (died of disease), 1920

Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else

Is Geo part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.

Also in this book 751

In context

Going through the Illinois roll in Soldiers of the Great War (1920) from A to Z, Geo is the 686th of 752 names on this site. On the scan the entry sits on page 276, among entries that run from page 234 to page 280. Geo is marked dead of disease; so are 199 others among the 750 entries here that record an outcome.

On the same scan page	Roy Solomon Hart, Peter Umathum, Joseph Vaira, Elmer Vance and 13 more
Recorded outcome	dead of disease: 200 of 750 with an outcome (27%)

Also in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Illinois

All 752 in this list →

Look for Geo Usherwood in other records

FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress

Do you know Geo?

If Geo is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.

Get in touch

Source

Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Illinois, page 276. View the original at the Internet Archive (item SoldiersOfTheGreatWarV1).

Published 1920, and therefore in the public domain in the United States. Scan courtesy of Internet Archive via the Internet Archive.

How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards