Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Virginia

George D. Neale

Private George D. Neale is listed in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Virginia (1920) as soldier, world war i. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.

Soldier, World War I, 1920

420 people in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Virginia · 3 more named Neale

Full name: George D. Neale
Source: Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Virginia
Listed as: Soldier, World War I, 1920

Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else

Is George part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.

Also in this book 419

In context

This site lists 420 people from the Virginia roll in Soldiers of the Great War (1920); sorted by surname, George comes 288th. Turn the scan to page 380 for George; this site found the book's entries between pages 360 and 399. George is listed as Private, a rank shared by 312 others among the 413 entries here that print one (76%).

On the same scan page	Burt Nicewander, Richard M. Norfleet, William L. Norris, Herbert W. Nuckols and 9 more
Same rank	Private: 313 of 413 with a printed rank (76%)

Also in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Virginia

All 420 in this list →

Look for George D. Neale in other records

FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress

Do you know George?

If George is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.

Get in touch

Source

Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Virginia, page 380. View the original at the Internet Archive (item SoldiersOfTheGreatWarV3).

Published 1920, and therefore in the public domain in the United States. Scan courtesy of Internet Archive via the Internet Archive.

How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards