Bain News Service photographs · United States
Glenn Curtis
Glenn Curtis is listed in Bain News Service photographs (1909) as portrait. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.
Portrait, 1909
1635 people in Bain News Service photographs · 68 more named Curtis
- Full name
- Glenn Curtis
- Source
- Bain News Service photographs
- Listed as
- Portrait, 1909
Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else
Is Glenn part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.
In context
In the alphabetical roll of 1635 names from the collection “Bain News Service photographs”, Glenn stands 353rd. 30 entries in this book on this site are dated 1909, Glenn's among them.
| Same year | 1909: 29 other entries in this book |
|---|
Also in Bain News Service photographs
James Michael CurleyBain News Service photographs 1917
Glenn Hammond CurtissBain News Service photographs 1909
William CunninghamBain News Service photographs 1913
Earl CurzonBain News Service photographs 1910
Homer S. CummingsBain News Service photographs 1914
Mary Stewart CuttingBain News Service photographs 1910
Others named Curtis
Same surname in the archive.
Arthur M. CurtisHarris & Ewing photographs 1905
Charles CurtisNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1920
Look for Glenn Curtis in other records
- FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
- Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
- Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress
Do you know Glenn?
If Glenn is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.
Source
Bain News Service photographs, 1909.
View the original
(item loc:2014684099).
No known restrictions on publication. Bain News Service press photograph (1900s-1920s). Held by the Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division.
How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards