Bain News Service photographs · United States
John P. Deering
John P. Deering is listed in Bain News Service photographs (1922) as portrait. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.
Portrait, 1922
1635 people in Bain News Service photographs · 8 more named Deering
- Full name
- John P. Deering
- Source
- Bain News Service photographs
- Listed as
- Portrait, 1922
Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else
Is John part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.
In context
1,635 entries from the collection “Bain News Service photographs” appear on this site, and Deering puts John 383rd among them. John's entry is dated 1922, a year shared by 4 other people in this book on this site.
| Same year | 1922: 4 other entries in this book |
|---|
Also in Bain News Service photographs
Charles A. DeanBain News Service photographs 1918
Loretta Del ValleBain News Service photographs 1915
Nicolaas J. De WetBain News Service photographs 1910
Joe DempseyBain News Service photographs 1915
Daniel De LeonBain News Service photographs 1910
Edwin DenbyBain News Service photographs 1910
Other people named John P. Deering in the archive
Names are not unique. Check the school and year before assuming this is the person you are looking for.
Look for John P. Deering in other records
- FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
- Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
- Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress
Do you know John?
If John is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.
Source
Bain News Service photographs, 1922.
View the original
(item loc:2014714310).
No known restrictions on publication. Bain News Service press photograph (1900s-1920s). Held by the Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division.
How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards
