National Photo Company Collection photographs · United States
John W. Danenhower
John W. Danenhower is listed in National Photo Company Collection photographs (1926) as portrait. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.
Portrait, 1926
37 people in National Photo Company Collection photographs · 1 more named Danenhower
- Full name
- John W. Danenhower
- Source
- National Photo Company Collection photographs
- Listed as
- Portrait, 1926
Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else
Is John part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.
In context
In the alphabetical roll of 37 names from the collection “National Photo Company Collection photographs”, John stands 9th. John's entry is dated 1926, a year shared by 8 other people in this book on this site.
| Same year | 1926: 8 other entries in this book |
|---|
Also in National Photo Company Collection photographs
Natalie BorchardtNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1926
David DavisNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1927
John Wilkes BoothNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1925
Clarence F. DonohoeNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1926
Julia M. BlandNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1926
Isaac GansNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1926
Look for John W. Danenhower in other records
- FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
- Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
- Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress
Do you know John?
If John is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.
Source
National Photo Company Collection photographs, 1926.
View the original
(item loc:2016841734).
Published 1937. Scan courtesy of the contributing library via the Internet Archive.
How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards