National Photo Company Collection photographs · United States
John W. Houser
John W. Houser is listed in National Photo Company Collection photographs (1926) as portrait. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.
Portrait, 1926
37 people in National Photo Company Collection photographs · 4 more named Houser
- Full name
- John W. Houser
- Source
- National Photo Company Collection photographs
- Listed as
- Portrait, 1926
Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else
Is John part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.
In context
37 entries from the collection “National Photo Company Collection photographs” appear on this site, and Houser puts John 19th among them. Of the 37 entries from this book on this site, 9 are dated 1926, as John's is.
| Same year | 1926: 8 other entries in this book |
|---|
Also in National Photo Company Collection photographs
Mary B. HooverNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1925
Ruth JardineNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1927
Joseph HolcombNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1925
Robert KosponskiNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1926
Stanley HarrisNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1925
Charles LinthicumNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1927
Look for John W. Houser in other records
- FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
- Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
- Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress
Do you know John?
If John is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.
Source
National Photo Company Collection photographs, 1926.
View the original
(item loc:2016842358).
Published 1937. Scan courtesy of the contributing library via the Internet Archive.
How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards