Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Kentucky

John W. Mefford

Private John W. Mefford of Springdale, Kentucky is listed in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Kentucky (1920) as soldier, world war i. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.

Soldier, World War I, 1920

479 people in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Kentucky · 1 more named Mefford

Full name: John W. Mefford
Source: Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Kentucky
Listed as: Soldier, World War I, 1920

Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else

Is John part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.

Also in this book 478

In context

Going through the Kentucky roll in Soldiers of the Great War (1920) from A to Z, John is the 278th of 479 names on this site. In the scan, John appears on page 402, within pages 386 to 413 of the 479 entries read for this site. 376 of the 472 men with a rank printed in this list (80%) held the rank of Private, as John did.

On the same scan page	Rollo Malicoat, Robert C. Marquess, Louis Martin, Grover Masden and 14 more
Same rank	Private: 376 of 472 with a printed rank (80%)

Also in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Kentucky

All 479 in this list →

Look for John W. Mefford in other records

FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress

Do you know John?

If John is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.

Get in touch

Source

Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Kentucky, page 402. View the original at the Internet Archive (item SoldiersOfTheGreatWarV1).

Published 1920, and therefore in the public domain in the United States. Scan courtesy of Internet Archive via the Internet Archive.

How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards