Bain News Service photographs · United States
Josephine Daskam Bacon
Josephine Daskam Bacon is listed in Bain News Service photographs (about 1900-1920) as portrait. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.
Portrait, about 1900-1920
1635 people in Bain News Service photographs · 33 more named Bacon
- Full name
- Josephine Daskam Bacon
- Source
- Bain News Service photographs
- Listed as
- Portrait, about 1900-1920
Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else
Is Josephine part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.
In context
Going through the collection “Bain News Service photographs” from A to Z, Josephine is the 47th of 1635 names on this site. 969 entries in this book on this site are dated 1910, Josephine's among them.
| Same year | 1910: 968 other entries in this book |
|---|
Also in Bain News Service photographs
Nathan L. BachmanBain News Service photographs 1910
Robert Low BaconBain News Service photographs 1908
Roger BabsonBain News Service photographs 1918
Gerhard A. BadingBain News Service photographs 1910
Alfred AustinBain News Service photographs 1910
Max BaffBain News Service photographs 1910
Others named Bacon
Same surname in the archive.
All 33 people named Bacon →Look for Josephine Daskam Bacon in other records
- FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
- Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
- Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress
Do you know Josephine?
If Josephine is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.
Source
Bain News Service photographs, about 1900-1920.
View the original
(item loc:2014682800).
No known restrictions on publication. Bain News Service press photograph (1900s-1920s). Held by the Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division.
How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards