Bain News Service photographs · United States
Kate Richards O'Hara
Kate Richards O'Hara is listed in Bain News Service photographs (1915) as portrait. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.
Portrait, 1915
1635 people in Bain News Service photographs · 23 more named O'Hara
- Full name
- Kate Richards O'Hara
- Source
- Bain News Service photographs
- Listed as
- Portrait, 1915
Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else
Is Kate part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.
In context
Going through the collection “Bain News Service photographs” from A to Z, Kate is the 1091st of 1635 names on this site. 331 entries in this book on this site are dated 1915, Kate's among them.
| Same year | 1915: 330 other entries in this book |
|---|
Also in Bain News Service photographs
Dorothea Warren O'HaraBain News Service photographs 1915
Arthur O'KeefeBain News Service photographs 1910
Frank T. O'HairBain News Service photographs 1910
Austin O'MalleyBain News Service photographs 1915
James O'GormanBain News Service photographs 1911
Robert M. O'ReillyBain News Service photographs 1908
Others named O'Hara
Same surname in the archive.
All 23 people named O'Hara →Look for Kate Richards O'Hara in other records
- FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
- Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
- Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress
Do you know Kate?
If Kate is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.
Source
Bain News Service photographs, 1915.
View the original
(item loc:2014701216).
No known restrictions on publication. Bain News Service press photograph (1900s-1920s). Held by the Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division.
How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards