Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: South Carolina

Owen B. Best

Private Owen B. Best is listed in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: South Carolina (1920) as soldier, world war i. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.

Soldier, World War I, 1920

152 people in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: South Carolina · 15 more named Best

Full name: Owen B. Best
Source: Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: South Carolina
Listed as: Soldier, World War I, 1920

Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else

Is Owen part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.

Also in this book 151

In context

In the alphabetical roll of 152 names from the South Carolina roll in Soldiers of the Great War (1920), Owen stands 2nd. Find Owen on page 207 of the scan, in a book whose entries here run from page 198 to page 207. Of 150 ranks printed in this list, 121 (81%) are Private, Owen's among them.

On the same scan page	Leonard C. Cuzack, Earl A. Davidson, James M. Ellison, Fredrick O. Garkins and 13 more
Same rank	Private: 121 of 150 with a printed rank (81%)

Also in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: South Carolina

All 152 in this list →

Look for Owen B. Best in other records

FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress

Do you know Owen?

If Owen is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.

Get in touch

Source

Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: South Carolina, page 207. View the original at the Internet Archive (item SoldiersOfTheGreatWarV3).

Published 1920, and therefore in the public domain in the United States. Scan courtesy of Internet Archive via the Internet Archive.

How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards