Bain News Service photographs · United States
Randall Thomas Davidson
Randall Thomas Davidson is listed in Bain News Service photographs (1922) as portrait. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.
Portrait, 1922
1635 people in Bain News Service photographs · 48 more named Davidson
- Full name
- Randall Thomas Davidson
- Born
- 1848
- Occupation
- abp. of Canterbury
- Source
- Bain News Service photographs
- Listed as
- Portrait, 1922
Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else
Is Randall part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.
In context
Going through the collection “Bain News Service photographs” from A to Z, Randall is the 366th of 1635 names on this site. Of the 1635 entries from this book on this site, 5 are dated 1922, as Randall's is.
| Same year | 1922: 4 other entries in this book |
|---|
Also in Bain News Service photographs
Dorothy DarlingtonBain News Service photographs 1910
J. Rhys DaviesBain News Service photographs 1910
Joseph R. DarlingBain News Service photographs 1910
Joseph E. DaviesBain News Service photographs 1910
Joseph DanielsBain News Service photographs 1910
Arthur P. DavisBain News Service photographs 1910
Look for Randall Thomas Davidson in other records
- FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
- Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
- Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress
Do you know Randall?
If Randall is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.
Source
Bain News Service photographs, 1922.
View the original
(item loc:2002713228).
No known restrictions on publication. Bain News Service press photograph (1900s-1920s). Held by the Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division.
How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards