Bain News Service photographs · United States
Thomas Baldwin
Thomas Baldwin is listed in Bain News Service photographs (about 1900-1920) as portrait. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.
Portrait, about 1900-1920
1635 people in Bain News Service photographs · 35 more named Baldwin
- Full name
- Thomas Baldwin
- Source
- Bain News Service photographs
- Listed as
- Portrait, about 1900-1920
Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else
Is Thomas part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.
In context
In the alphabetical roll of 1635 names from the collection “Bain News Service photographs”, Thomas stands 65th. 969 entries in this book on this site are dated 1910, Thomas's among them.
| Same year | 1910: 968 other entries in this book |
|---|
Also in Bain News Service photographs
Stanley BaldwinBain News Service photographs 1920
Richard Achilles BallingerBain News Service photographs 1909
Francis E. BaldwinBain News Service photographs 1915
Ernest BambergerBain News Service photographs 1920
Leon BakstBain News Service photographs 1915
Simon BambergerBain News Service photographs 1915
Others named Baldwin
Same surname in the archive.
Francis E. BaldwinBain News Service photographs 1915
Stanley BaldwinBain News Service photographs 1920
Look for Thomas Baldwin in other records
- FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
- Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
- Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress
Do you know Thomas?
If Thomas is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.
Source
Bain News Service photographs, about 1900-1920.
View the original
(item loc:2014688441).
No known restrictions on publication. Bain News Service press photograph (1900s-1920s). Held by the Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division.
How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards