Bain News Service photographs · United States

Thomas W. Miller

Thomas W. Miller is listed in Bain News Service photographs (1915) as portrait. The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.

Portrait, 1915

1635 people in Bain News Service photographs · 255 more named Miller

Full name: Thomas W. Miller
Source: Bain News Service photographs
Listed as: Portrait, 1915

Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else

Is Thomas part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.

Same surname 9
Also in this book 1634

In context

Thomas W. Miller is number 1025 of 1635 in the alphabetical list of the collection “Bain News Service photographs” on this site. 330 other entries in this book on this site carry the year 1915, as Thomas's does.

Same year	1915: 330 other entries in this book

Also in Bain News Service photographs

All 1635 in this list →

Other people named Thomas W. Miller in the archive

Names are not unique. Check the school and year before assuming this is the person you are looking for.

Thomas W. MillerNational Photo Company Collection photographs 1921

Others named Miller

Same surname in the archive.

All 255 people named Miller →

Look for Thomas W. Miller in other records

FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress

Do you know Thomas?

If Thomas is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.

Get in touch

Source

Bain News Service photographs, 1915. View the original (item loc:2014710016).

No known restrictions on publication. Bain News Service press photograph (1900s-1920s). Held by the Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division.

How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards