Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Texas

William J. Hastings

Private William J. Hastings of Stamford, Texas is listed in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Texas (1920) as soldier, world war i (died of accident). The page shows the portrait and details printed in that source.

Soldier, World War I (died of accident), 1920

614 people in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Texas · 28 more named Hastings

Full name: William J. Hastings
Source: Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Texas
Listed as: Soldier, World War I (died of accident), 1920

Spot a mistake? Wrong name Wrong photo Something else

Is William part of your family? Tell us — we will send you the full-resolution scan.

Also in this book 613

In context

Of the 614 entries from the Texas roll in Soldiers of the Great War (1920) that have pages here, William is 232nd in surname order. The entry is on page 291 of the scan; this site's entries from the book run from page 274 to page 325. 473 of the 601 men with a rank printed in this list (79%) held the rank of Private, as William did.

On the same scan page	James J. Hall, Harris B. Hallford, Ben G. Ham, Jack H. Harlan and 8 more
Same rank	Private: 473 of 601 with a printed rank (79%)

Also in Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Texas

All 614 in this list →

Look for William J. Hastings in other records

FamilySearch census, birth, marriage and death records (free account)
Internet Archive other yearbooks, city directories and town reports that mention the name
Chronicling America digitized newspapers at the Library of Congress

Do you know William?

If William is part of your family we would like to hear from you, and we will gladly send the full-resolution scan of this page.

Get in touch

Source

Soldiers of the Great War, 1920: Texas, page 291. View the original at the Internet Archive (item SoldiersOfTheGreatWarV3).

Published 1920, and therefore in the public domain in the United States. Scan courtesy of Internet Archive via the Internet Archive.

How this page was made: the name, portrait and printed details were read from the scan by software and checked against the page; a few in every hundred details are still wrong. How it works · Report an error · Standards